ArticleMycopathologia2024
Integrating Clinical and Microbiological Expertise to Improve Vaginal Candidiasis Management.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of vulvovaginal candidiasis in China: a six-year retrospective single-center study from a tertiary obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Shanghai.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Phenotypic and genotypic differences between bloodstream and non-bloodMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Perspectives on Vaginal Ecology and Management of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Narrative Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prevalence of Candida and Other Yeasts in Vulvovaginal Infections during Pregnancy: A 10-Year Serbian Survey.Mycopathologia · 2025Article
- Antifungal Testing of VaginalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vaginal candidiasis (VC) is a prevalent condition among women of reproductive age and poses a significant global public health challenge. However, the disease is often diagnosed and treated without mycological information. We investigated the epidemiology, laboratory diagnostics, and antifungal susceptibility of VC. We included 300 women from Çukurova University Obstetrics and Gynecology outpatient clinic in Adana, Türkiye. Participants underwent a health survey and provided vaginal swab samples for microscopic examination and fungal culture. The microscopic analysis involved wet-mount and gram-stained slides, whereas fungal identification involved CHROMAgar Candida, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and real-time polymerase chain reaction high-resolution melting analysis (RT-PCR HRMA). Antifungal susceptibility tests were conducted at pH 7 and 4 using the CLSI document M44-A2. Of the 106 women with positive fungal cultures, 86.8% were diagnosed with VC, whereas 13.2% showed Candida colonization. Among those with VC, 55.4% had acute and 44.6% had recurrent VC; a family history of allergies increased the risk for both types. We recovered 115 yeast isolates, predominantly C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei. Diagnostic accuracy of CHROMAgar Candida was 91.3% for the most common isolates, and HRMA was consistent in differential diagnosis. Antifungal resistance varied with pH; susceptibility to fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole decreased at pH 4, whereas susceptibility to miconazole increased. Our findings underscore the need for a diagnostic algorithm and enhanced collaboration between clinicians and microbiologists to improve VC management. Recommendations include using Gram staining, CHROMAgar Candida, MALDI-TOF MS, and antifungal susceptibility tests at both pH levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39514006What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.