Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513904›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Avian Models for Human Carcinogenesis-Recent Findings from Molecular and Clinical Research.

Julia Niebora, Krzysztof Data, Dominika Domagała, Małgorzata Józkowiak, Saoirse Barrett, Tannaz Norizadeh Abbariki, Artur Bryja, Magdalena Kulus, Sławomir Woźniak, Hanna Ziemak and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Julia NieboraDivision of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.
Krzysztof DataDivision of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9018-5357
Dominika DomagałaDivision of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0008-5220-7851
Małgorzata JózkowiakDivision of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.
Saoirse BarrettHuman Clinical Embryology & Assisted Conception, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
Tannaz Norizadeh AbbarikiFlyblast BV, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Artur BryjaDivision of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4338-8119
Magdalena KulusDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-5627
Sławomir WoźniakDivision of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7450-7993
Hanna ZiemakVeterinary Clinic of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Hanna Piotrowska-KempistyDepartment of Toxicology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-631 Poznan, Poland.
Paweł AntosikDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Dorota BukowskaDepartment of Diagnostics and Clinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Paul MozdziakPrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1575-3123
Piotr DzięgielDivision of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Bartosz KempistyDivision of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture NC7082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds, especially the chick and hen, have been important biomedical research models for centuries due to the accessibility of the avian embryo and the early discovery of avian viruses. Comprehension of avian tumor virology was a milestone in basic cancer research, as was that of non-viral genesis, as it enabled the discovery of oncogenes. Furthermore, studies on avian viruses provided initial insights into Kaposi's sarcoma and EBV-induced diseases. However, the role of birds in human carcinogenesis extends beyond the realm of virology research. Utilization of CAM, the chorioallantoic membrane, an easily accessible extraembryonic tissue with rich vasculature, has enabled studies on tumor-induced angiogenesis and metastasis and the efficient screening of potential anti-cancer compounds. Also, the chick embryo alone is an effective preclinical in vivo patient-derived xenograft model, which is important for the development of personalized therapies. Furthermore, adult birds may also closely resemble human oncogenesis, as evidenced by the laying hen, which is the only animal model of a spontaneous form of ovarian cancer. Avian models may create an interesting alternative compared with mammalian models, enabling the creation of a relatively cost-effective and easy-to-maintain platform to address key questions in cancer biology.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBirdsChick EmbryoChickensHumansNeoplasmscarcinogenesischorioallantoic membranehen modeloncovirusesovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID39513904
PMCPMC11544849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.