Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513901›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Advancing CRISPR-Based Solutions for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Therapeutics.

Roaa Hadi, Abhishek Poddar, Shivakumar Sonnaila, Venkata Suryanarayana Murthy Bhavaraju, Shilpi Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Bacteria as living biosensors for DNA.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roaa HadiCell and Molecular Biology Program, Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Abhishek PoddarDepartment of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8164-1771
Shivakumar SonnailaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Venkata Suryanarayana Murthy BhavarajuDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Shilpi AgrawalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4209-571X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a variety of diagnostic approaches, including RT-qPCR, RAPID, and LFA, have been adopted, with RT-qPCR emerging as the gold standard. However, a significant challenge in COVID-19 diagnostics is the wide range of symptoms presented by patients, necessitating early and accurate diagnosis for effective management. Although RT-qPCR is a precise molecular technique, it is not immune to false-negative results. In contrast, CRISPR-based detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 offer several advantages: they are cost-effective, time-efficient, highly sensitive, and specific, and they do not require sophisticated instruments. These methods also show promise for scalability, enabling diagnostic tests. CRISPR technology can be customized to target any genomic region of interest, making it a versatile tool with applications beyond diagnostics, including therapeutic development. The CRISPR/Cas systems provide precise gene targeting with immense potential for creating next-generation diagnostics and therapeutics. One of the key advantages of CRISPR/Cas-based therapeutics is the ability to perform multiplexing, where different sgRNAs or crRNAs can target multiple sites within the same gene, reducing the likelihood of viral escape mutants. Among the various CRISPR systems, CRISPR/Cas13 and CARVER (Cas13-assisted restriction of viral expression and readout) are particularly promising. These systems can target a broad range of single-stranded RNA viruses, making them suitable for the diagnosis and treatment of various viral diseases, including SARS-CoV-2. However, the efficacy and safety of CRISPR-based therapeutics must be thoroughly evaluated in pre-clinical and clinical settings. While CRISPR biotechnologies have not yet been fully harnessed to control the current COVID-19 pandemic, there is an optimism that the limitations of the CRISPR/Cas system can be overcome soon. This review discusses how CRISPR-based strategies can revolutionize disease diagnosis and therapeutic development, better preparing us for future viral threats.

Indexed as

COVID-19CRISPR-Cas SystemsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCOVID-19 TestingGene EditingHumansCOVID-19CRISPR/CasCRISPR-DxCRISPR-Txdetection methodsdiagnosticsGene targetingSARS-CoV-2therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID39513901
PMCPMC11545109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.