Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513697›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2024

Mixed reality applications in upper extremity surgery: the future is now.

Daniel B Calem, Przemysław Lubiatowski, Scott Trenhaile, Bruno Gobbato, Ivan Wong, Jawaher Alkhateeb, John Erickson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel B CalemRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6804-9298
Przemysław LubiatowskiSports Trauma and Biomechanics Unit, Rehasport Clinic, Poznań, Poland.
Scott TrenhaileOrthoillinois, Rockford, Illinois, USA.
Bruno GobbatoDepartamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital São José, Jaraguá do Sul, SC, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-7779-0659
Ivan WongDivision of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jawaher AlkhateebDivision of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
John EricksonOverlook Medical Center, Atlantic Health System, Orthopaedic Surgery, New Providence, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed reality refers to the integration of virtual reality into the real-world environment. This digital content can be interacted with in real time. The emergence of mixed reality technology has been made possible by the introduction of head-mounted displays, which are being utilized across multiple surgical specialties. In upper extremity surgery, mixed reality has widespread applications in trauma, corrective surgery, arthroplasty, arthroscopy, and oncology. Preoperatively, mixed reality allows for complex 3D planning. Intraoperatively, surgeons can access this 3D data in a sterile environment. While in its infant stages, mixed reality is likely to become a powerful tool for intraoperative guidance and navigation. Mixed reality can change the paradigm of communication, as it allows the sharing of visual data from the surgeon's perspective, enabling remote assistance and participation.

Indexed as

augmented realitymixed realitypreoperative planningtechnologyupper extremity surgery

Identifiers

PMID39513697
PMCPMC11619721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.