ArticleEndocrine connections2025
Somatic GNAS mutations in acromegaly: prevalence, clinical features and gender differences.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical characteristics associated with somaticFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Pathogenesis of nonfamilial somatotroph adenomas.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- The evolution and application of multi-omic analysis for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Somatic GNAS mutations are acknowledged as a significant etiological factor for acromegaly. However, the relationship between GNAS mutation status, clinical characteristics and gender has not been adequately investigated. This study aims to address these gaps by examining GNAS mutations and delineating the detailed clinical profile of affected patients within a Chinese acromegaly cohort. Methods: Our study encompassed 97 individuals newly diagnosed with acromegaly who underwent surgical treatment between May 2015 and January 2022. We obtained DNA from frozen pituitary adenomas to screen for GNAS hotspot mutations and assessed the associated clinical characteristics. Results: In our cohort, 44.3% (43/97) of patients exhibited somatic GNAS mutations. Patients with mutations were predominantly male (58.1 vs 33.3%, P = 0.015), experienced longer diagnosis delays (72.0 (48.0, 120.0) vs 36.0 (21.0, 75.0) months, P = 0.002), had smaller maximum tumor diameters (1.75 ± 0.83 vs 2.23 ± 0.89 cm, P = 0.008) and demonstrated higher rates of growth hormone (GH) secretion per unit tumor volume (18.93 (9.67, 30.12) vs 10.91 (2.80, 20.40) ng/mL cm-3, P = 0.005). Regarding gender-specific differences, GNAS mutations in male patients were linked to significantly higher baseline GH levels (24.40 (14.40, 36.30) vs 10.55 (5.25, 16.95) ng/mL, P = 0.002), while female patients with mutations had notably smaller tumor sizes (1.55 ± 0.55 cm vs 2.32 ± 0.85 cm, P < 0.001). Conclusion: GNAS mutations are prevalent among Chinese acromegaly patients, correlating with reduced pituitary tumor sizes and enhanced GH secretion functions. Our findings underscore the influence of gender on the clinical manifestations of GNAS mutations. Accordingly, we recommend that future clinical and foundational research studies on acromegaly give heightened consideration to gender-specific differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.