Observational studyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025
Census growth and challenges of a novel Hospital at Home program: A retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a High-Acuity Next Day Clinic for Hospital Admission Avoidance: A 13-Month Cohort Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Census growth and challenges of a novel Hospital at Home program: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital at Home (HaH) is a growing care model requiring significant investments. Critical to starting a program is estimating census and enrollments. The objective of this study was to compare expected versus actual consults, enrollments, and barriers in a novel HaH program.
methodsThis was an observational, retrospective cohort study at a single urban academic medical center. Adult inpatients considered for enrollment to HaH were included. Demographic data, diagnoses and outcomes data were extracted for HaH patients. Volume and outcomes of HaH consults were recorded, including reasons for ineligibility or a patient declining to enroll.
resultsOver the first year of implementation, 248 patients enrolled. The average daily census (ADC) grew over months 1-6, then plateaued at a mean of 4.4 patients during month 10, with an overall ADC range from 0 to 7 patients. From months 7 to 12, there were 724 consults for a home hospital assessment, of which 22.5% (163/724) of patients were enrolled, 21.8% (158/724) declined to enroll, 29.3% (212/724) were ineligible for the program, and 26.4% (191/724) had consults that were deferred until the time of discharge and never explicitly consented or refused. The most common reasons for program ineligibility were complex care needs, insurance status, and not meeting inpatient status. The most common reasons patients declined to enroll were a preference to remain in the brick-and-mortar hospital and home conditions not suitable for HaH.
conclusionsThis retrospective, cohort study defines the challenges of enrolling patients in an HaH program and provides areas for other programs to examine as they start or grow a program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.