Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513334›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2024

An Artificial Intelligence Approach for Test-Free Identification of Sarcopenia.

Liangyu Yin, Jinghong Zhao

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liangyu YinDepartment of Nephrology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment of Kidney Disease, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8876-2680
Jinghong ZhaoDepartment of Nephrology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment of Kidney Disease, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9750-3285

Funding

Key program of the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China U22A20279Key project of Chongqing technology development and application program CSTB2023TIAD-KPX0060National Natural Science Foundation of China 82 304 131Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China 2024NSCQ-MSX3470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of sarcopenia relies extensively on human and equipment resources and requires individuals to personally visit medical institutions. The objective of this study was to develop a test-free, self-assessable approach to identify sarcopenia by utilizing artificial intelligence techniques and representative real-world data.

methodsThis multicentre study enrolled 11 661 middle-aged and older adults from a national survey initialized in 2011. Follow-up data from the baseline cohort collected in 2013 (n = 9403) and 2015 (n = 10 356) were used for validation. Sarcopenia was retrospectively diagnosed using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 framework. Baseline age, sex, height, weight and 20 functional capacity (FC)-related binary indices (activities of daily living = 6, instrumental activities of daily living = 5 and other FC indices = 9) were considered as predictors. Multiple machine learning (ML) models were trained and cross-validated using 70% of the baseline data to predict sarcopenia. The remaining 30% of the baseline data, along with two follow-up datasets (n = 9403 and n = 10 356, respectively), were used to assess model performance.

resultsThe study included 5634 men and 6027 women (median age = 57.0 years). Sarcopenia was identified in 1288 (11.0%) individuals. Among the 20 FC indices, the running/jogging 1 km item showed the highest predictive value for sarcopenia (AUC [95%CI] = 0.633 [0.620-0.647]). From the various ML models assessed, a 24-variable gradient boosting classifier (GBC) model was selected. This GBC model demonstrated favourable performance in predicting sarcopenia in the holdout data (AUC [95%CI] = 0.831 [0.808-0.853], accuracy = 0.889, recall = 0.441, precision = 0.475, F1 score = 0.458, Kappa = 0.396 and Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.396). Further model validation on the temporal scale using two longitudinal datasets also demonstrated good performance (AUC [95%CI]: 0.833 [0.818-0.848] and 0.852 [0.840-0.865], respectively). The model's built-in feature importance ranking and the SHapley Additive exPlanations method revealed that lifting 5 kg and running/jogging 1 km were relatively important variables among the 20 FC items contributing to the model's predictive capacity, respectively. The calibration curve of the model indicated good agreement between predictions and actual observations (Hosmer and Lemeshow p = 0.501, 0.451 and 0.374 for the three test sets, respectively), and decision curve analysis supported its clinical usefulness. The model was implemented as an online web application and exported as a deployable binary file, allowing for flexible, individualized risk assessment.

conclusionsWe developed an artificial intelligence model that can assist in the identification of sarcopenia, particularly in settings lacking the necessary resources for a comprehensive diagnosis. These findings offer potential for improving decision-making and facilitating the development of novel management strategies of sarcopenia.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligencefunctional capacitymachine learningsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID39513334
PMCPMC11634523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.