Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513282›Full record

Trial reportJournal of global health2024

Access to affordable daycare and women's mental health in Rajasthan, India: Evidence from a cluster-randomised social intervention.

Arijit Nandi, Parul Agarwal, Anoushaka Chandrashekar, Shannon Maloney, Robin Richardson, Laxmi Thakur, Sam Harper

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arijit NandiInstitute for Health and Social Policy and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Parul AgarwalInstitute for Financial Management and Research, Leveraging Evidence for Access and Development, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anoushaka ChandrashekarInstitute for Financial Management and Research, Leveraging Evidence for Access and Development, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shannon MaloneyDepartment of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Robin RichardsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Laxmi ThakurSeva Mandir, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Sam HarperInstitute for Health and Social Policy and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women in India are often responsible for unpaid household work, family caregiving, and paid work, which can contribute to poorer mental health. The provision of childcare has the potential to improve women's mental health, but evidence on the effects of providing access to daycare is limited. Methods: We designed a cluster-randomised trial and used data from a sample of 2858 mothers with age-eligible children from 160 village hamlets in rural Rajasthan, India, to evaluate the impact of providing access to a community-based daycare programme on social and emotional aspects of women's mental health. We conducted a baseline survey in early 2016, randomised hamlets to intervention or control groups approximately six months later, and delivered the final post-intervention survey approximately two years thereafter. Results: Treatment assignment increased the probability that a respondent used a daycare over the two-year follow-up by 40.9 percentage points. Providing randomised access to a daycare resulted in 0.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.1, 0.4) fewer symptoms of mental distress, representing a 9.5% decline compared to the baseline mean of 2.1 symptoms, as well as a 3.7 (95% CI = -0.8, 8.3) percentage point increase in the proportion of women who reported feeling very happy, equivalent to an 11.0% increase relative to the baseline mean of 33.6%. Among social indicators, treatment assignment was associated with a 5.6 (95% CI = -1.2, 12.4) percentage point increase in membership in an association, a relative increase of 43.4% compared to the baseline mean of 12.9%. The intervention did not have an appreciable impact on measures of life satisfaction or trust in institutions. Two-stage least squares instrumental variable analyses showed that daycare use decreased mental distress by 0.4 (95% CI = -0.1, 0.8) symptoms, increased the proportion of women who were very happy by 9.4 (95% CI = 0.0, 17.6) percentage points, and increased membership in an organisation by 15.9 (95% CI = 8.4, 23.7) percentage points. Conclusions: The provision of affordable, community-based daycare was associated with substantial uptake and showed potential for improving mothers' mental health in a rural context where most women were not employed in the formal labour force. Registration: ISRCTN clinical trial registry (ISRCTN45369145), registered on 16 May 2016; American Economic Association's registry for randomised controlled trials (AEARCTR-0000774), registered on 15 July 2015.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdultChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansIndiaMothersPsychosocial InterventionRural PopulationWomen's HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39513282
PMCPMC11544523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.