SynthesisJournal of global health2024
Dysregulated blood biomarkers in women with acute and chronic respiratory conditions due to air pollutant exposure: An exploratory systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modifying Role of Sustainable Diets on the Association Between Particulate Matter and Biological Aging: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.Aging cell · 2026Article
- Association of platelet-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio with coronary heart disease prevalence in asthma patients: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 1999-2018.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Air pollution exposure poses significant health risks for the general population, but particularly for women with acute and chronic respiratory conditions. Given the increasing global burden of air pollution-related illnesses, understanding these biomarkers is crucial for developing targeted interventions and improving respiratory health outcomes in vulnerable populations. In this systematic review, we aimed to determine potential dysregulated respiratory inflammatory blood biomarker candidates in adult female patients who experience varying levels and sources of inhaled pollutant exposure. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science with nuanced search terms to retrieve articles published in English between 1 January 2000 and 12 June 2023, to ensure relevancy. We filtered our findings to generate a focussed narrative analysis and used the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposures (ROBINS-E) and Risk-of-bias VISualization (robVIS) tools to ensure the validity of the data and the quality of the conclusions being made. Results: We identified 916 articles from the databases used in our search, 16 of which met the criteria of our focussed narrative analysis. Among blood biomarkers, platelet-activating factor and eosinophilia could be used to assess the severity of asthma conditions, as a lack or reduction thereof indicates specific conditions. Pro-inflammatory cytokines require further validation, as some studies with a high risk of bias have reported conflicting results compared to more recent research on whether these markers are up-regulated or down-regulated. We found one study to be at a very high risk of bias, two had a high risk of bias, one had some concerns of confounding factors which may not have affected their results, and 12 studies had a low risk of bias. Conclusions: There were narrowed-down blood biomarker candidates that could be used in future research and avenues of research like generating specific microRNA sequences to test for prognostic/diagnostic tests. Registration: PROSPERO: 42023435721.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.