Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513176›Full record

ArticleClimatic change2024

Perspectives on the quality of climate information for adaptation decision support.

Marina Baldissera Pacchetti, Suraje Dessai, James S Risbey, David A Stainforth, Erica Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Climatic change, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marina Baldissera PacchettiDepartment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, UCL, London, UK.
Suraje DessaiSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
James S RisbeyCSIRO, Hobart, Australia.
David A StainforthGrantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment, LSE, London, UK.
Erica ThompsonDepartment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3750-8388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We summarise the contributions to the Topical Collection on quality of climate information for adaptation decision support. Based on these contributions, we draw some further lessons for the development of high-quality climate information and services, bridging between a "credibility-first" paradigm (exemplified by top-down information provision from systematic downscaling or impact projections) and a "salience-first" paradigm (exemplified by user-led tailored information products or storylines) by looking to identify their respective strengths and use cases. We emphasise that a more nuanced collective understanding of the dimensions of information quality in climate information and services would be beneficial to users and providers and ultimately support more confident and effective climate adaptation decisions and policy-making.

Indexed as

AdaptationClimate informationDecision supportProjectionsStorylines

Identifiers

PMID39513176
PMCPMC11538180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.