ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2024
The effect of aortic morphology on perioperative rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm-a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The high mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is well-documented. However, the perioperative rupture risk is often underestimated. Aortic morphology is a key unresolved factor influencing this risk. This study aims to assess the impact of aortic morphology on the risk of perioperative rupture of AAAs. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients undergoing perioperative endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for AAAs between September 2017 and October 2021. All measurements were obtained using dedicated hospital reconstruction software. The primary endpoints were mortality and AAAs rupture. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the association of risk factors with rupture. Piecewise linear regression was used to analyze the threshold effect of proximal neck angulation on rupture of AAAs. The clinical correlation between proximal aneurysm neck angulation and rupture was retrospectively studied after adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A total of 160 patients were included. The incidence of AAAs rupture in patients with severe proximal aneurysm neck angulation was significantly higher than in patients without proximal aneurysm neck angulation (15.9% Conclusions: EVAR remains the preferred surgical approach for managing AAAs, guided by morphological and anatomical considerations. We have established a significant correlation between the extent of proximal neck angulation and the risk of perioperative rupture in aneurysms. Proximal neck angulation differs significantly between genders, with females exhibiting greater angulation than males. Clinicians should meticulously assess proximal neck angulation in patients undergoing EVAR and consider early intervention for those with severe angulation to mitigate the risk of rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.