Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513135›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2024

Number of attempts and interventions to obtain a valid pulmonary artery wedge pressure.

Eduard Krishtopaytis, Mohammed Obeidat, Noor Ramahi, Fatima Abdeljaleel, James Lane, David Toth, Deborah Paul, Matthew T Siuba, Adriano R Tonelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Treatment of pulmonary hypertension after seven world symposia.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eduard KrishtopaytisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mohammed ObeidatDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Noor RamahiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Fatima AbdeljaleelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
James LaneDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Integrated Hospital Care Institute (IHI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David TothDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Integrated Hospital Care Institute (IHI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Deborah PaulDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Integrated Hospital Care Institute (IHI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Matthew T SiubaDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Integrated Hospital Care Institute (IHI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Adriano R TonelliDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Integrated Hospital Care Institute (IHI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A valid pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) is essential for the hemodynamic characterization of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We prospectively investigated the methodology for obtaining a valid PAWP measurement, while assessing the impact of prespecified factors on its determination. Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, we included consecutive patients who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) using fluoroscopy at the Pulmonary Vascular Disease program at Cleveland Clinic, between February and May 2023. Once a valid PAWP was obtained, we recorded the number of attempts, reason for repeating the determination, pulmonary artery location, depth of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) from the introducer hub, and inflation volume of the PAC balloon. Results: We included 195 patients, age: 57.5±15.7 years, 111 (57%) women, 156 (80%) with PH. The PAWP was 16.4±5.9 mmHg, requiring 1, 2 and ≥3 attempts for a valid measurement in 139 (71%), 39 (20%) and 17 (9%) patients, respectively. PAWP was repeated due to abnormal waveform, incomplete wedge and over wedge. A valid PAWP was obtained in the right pulmonary circulation in 168 (86%) patients, and in the lower third in 134 (69%), middle third in 58 (30%), and upper third of the lung in 3 (2%) patients. The pulmonary artery catheter balloon inflation at valid PAWP was 1.0±0.3 mL, at a distance from the introducer hub of 52.6±5.2 cm. Aspiration of blood in PAW position was obtained in 141 (72%) patients with an arterial oxygenation of 97% (95-99%). The number of measurements for a valid PAWP was directly associated with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (r=0.18, P=0.01), PAWP (r=0.22, P=0.002), and pulmonary artery diameter on computed tomography (r=0.16, P=0.04). Conclusions: A valid PAWP was obtained during the first or second attempt in about 90% of patients that undergo RHC. Advanced interventions such as relocating the PAC to a different place of the same lung or contralateral pulmonary circulation are needed in about 10% of patients.

Indexed as

errors in measurementhemodynamicspulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP)Pulmonary hypertension (PH)right heart catheterization (RHC)

Identifiers

PMID39513135
PMCPMC11538838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.