ArticleJMA journal2024
Characteristics of Fresh Lumbar Spondylolysis Occurring below the Age of 9 Years.
Article in JMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lumbar Spondylolysis: Future Perspectives.JMA journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to compare two groups (9 years or younger [U-9] and 10 years or older [O-10]) of patients with fresh lumbar spondylolysis and elucidate their characteristics. Methods: This study enrolled 51 elementary school students diagnosed with fresh lumbar spondylolysis through magnetic resonance imaging between March 2015 and March 2022. Study 1 included 10 and 46 patients in the early- and late-grade groups, respectively. Patient characteristics at disease onset (sex, presence or absence of spina bifida occulta [SBO] in the affected vertebra, vertebral level, unilaterality or bilaterality of lesions, presence of a contralateral terminal stage, and disease stage) were compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, Study 2 included 34 patients with confirmed successful or failed bone union. The bone union rates in both groups were compared, and the factors affecting bone union in the entire study cohort were examined. Results: In Study 1, the proportions of SBO, bilateral, and advanced stage cases were significantly higher in the U-9 group than in the O-10 group. In Study 2, the bone union rate was significantly lower in the U-9 group than in the O-10 group. Conclusions: The proportions of SBO, bilateral, and advanced stage cases were significantly higher in the U-9 group than in the O-10 group. The bone union rate was significantly lower in the U-9 group than in the O-10 group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.