Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Evaluation of EMG patterns in children during assisted walking in the exoskeleton.

Margherita Villani, Priscilla Avaltroni, Giulia Scordo, Damiana Rubeca, Peter Kreynin, Ekaterina Bereziy, Denise Berger, Germana Cappellini, Francesca Sylos-Labini, Francesco Lacquaniti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margherita VillaniLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Priscilla AvaltroniLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Giulia ScordoLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Damiana RubecaLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Peter KreyninExoAtlet, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Ekaterina BereziyExoAtlet, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Denise BergerLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Germana CappelliniLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Francesca Sylos-LabiniLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Francesco LacquanitiLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Yury IvanenkoLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While exoskeleton technology is becoming more and more common for gait rehabilitation in children with neurological disorders, evaluation of gait performance still faces challenges and concerns. The reasoning behind evaluating the spinal locomotor output is that, while exoskeleton's guidance forces create the desired walking kinematics, they also affect sensorimotor interactions, which may lead to an abnormal spatiotemporal integration of activity in particular spinal segments and the risk of abnormalities in gait recovery. Therefore, traditional indicators based on kinematic or kinetic characteristics for optimizing exoskeleton controllers for gait rehabilitation may be supplemented by performance measures associated with the neural control mechanisms. The purpose of this study on a sample of children was to determine the basic features of lower limb muscle activity and to implement a method for assessing the neuromechanics of spinal locomotor output during exoskeleton-assisted gait. To this end, we assessed the effects of a robotic exoskeleton (ExoAtlet Bambini) on gait performance, by recording electromyographic activity of leg muscles and analyzing the corresponding spinal motor pool output. A slower walking setting (about 0.2 m/s) was chosen on the exoskeleton. The results showed that, even with slower walking, the level of muscle activation was roughly comparable during exoskeleton-assisted gait and normal walking. This suggests that, despite full assistance for leg movements, the child's locomotor controllers can interpret step-related afferent information promoting essential activity in leg muscles. This is most likely explained by the active nature of stepping in the exoskeleton (the child was not fully relaxed, experienced full foot loading and needed to maintain the upper trunk posture). In terms of the general muscle activity patterns, we identified notable variations for the proximal leg muscles, coactivation of the lumbar and sacral motor pools, and weak propulsion from the distal extensors at push-off. These changes led to the lack of characteristic lumbosacral oscillations of the center of motoneuron activity, normally associated with the pendulum mechanism of bipedal walking. This work shows promise as a useful technique for analyzing exoskeleton performance to help children develop their natural gait pattern and to guide system optimization in the future for inclusion into clinical care.

Indexed as

assisted gaitchildrendevelopmentEMG patternsrobotic exoskeletonspinal locomotor output

Identifiers

PMID39513047
PMCPMC11541598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.