Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39513001›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2024

Magnetoactive,

Katherine Wei, Avinava Roy, Sonia Ejike, Madeline K Eiken, Eleanor M Plaster, Alan Shi, Max Shtein, Claudia Loebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine Wei *Materials Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Avinava Roy *Materials Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Sonia EjikeSchool of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Madeline K EikenBiomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Eleanor M PlasterBiomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Alan ShiMaterials Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Max ShteinMaterials Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Claudia LoebelMaterials Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-5663

Funding

Engineered alveolar organoids to understand ECM signalingR00HL151670 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOEBEL, CLAUDIA · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL151670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical forces provide critical biological signals to cells. Within the distal lung, tensile forces act across the basement membrane and epithelial cells atop. Stretching devices have supported studies of mechanical forces in distal lung epithelium to gain mechanistic insights into pulmonary diseases. However, the integration of curvature into devices applying mechanical forces onto lung epithelial cell monolayers has remained challenging. To address this, we developed a hammock-shaped platform that offers desired curvature and mechanical forces to lung epithelial monolayers. Methods: We developed hammocks using polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-based membranes and magnetic-particle modified silicone elastomer films within a 48-well plate that mimic the alveolar curvature and tensile forces during breathing. These hammocks were engineered and characterized for mechanical and cell-adhesive properties to facilitate cell culture. Using human small airway epithelial cells (SAECs), we measured monolayer formation and mechanosensing using F-Actin staining and immunofluorescence for cytokeratin to visualize intermediate filaments. Results: We demonstrate a multi-functional design that facilitates a range of curvatures along with the incorporation of magnetic elements for dynamic actuation to induce mechanical forces. Using this system, we then showed that SAECs remain viable, proliferate, and form an epithelial cell monolayer across the entire hammock. By further applying mechanical stimulation via magnetic actuation, we observed an increase in proliferation and strengthening of the cytoskeleton, suggesting an increase in mechanosensing. Conclusion: This hammock strategy provides an easily accessible and tunable cell culture platform for mimicking distal lung mechanical forces in vitro. We anticipate the promise of this culture platform for mechanistic studies, multi-modal stimulation, and drug or small molecule testing, extendable to other cell types and organ systems. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-024-00808-z.

Indexed as

Dynamic cultureLung epithelial cellsMagnetic actuation KirigamiMechanotransduction

Identifiers

PMID39513001
PMCPMC11538102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.