ReviewCureus2024
Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels for Routine Pediatric Examinations in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aims to review the diagnostic reference levels reported for pediatric patients who underwent routine CT exams in Saudi Arabia. The literature search was conducted in prominent search engines, including PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Saudi Digital Library (SDL), which serve as important sources in the fields of radiology, radiography, and medical physics. The search was conducted to identify previous studies that have reported diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for pediatric CT examinations. Only studies that specifically assessed DRLs in pediatric patients were considered for inclusion. On careful evaluation, eight publications were ultimately chosen out of the 31 that were originally considered. An assessment was made on the volume computed tomographic dose index (CTDIvol) and the dose-length product (DLP) values. The reported range of mean values for DLP (mGy.cm) included in this review for brain, chest, abdomen, abdomen and pelvis, and CAP (chest, abdomen, and pelvis) was 172-1881, 27.3-458.9, 94.5-790.1, 78-236, and 94.2, respectively. Moreover, the reported range of mean values for CTDIvol (mGy) included in this review for the brain, chest, abdomen, abdomen and pelvis, and CAP were 11.7-79.9, 1.2-20.1, 7.4-22.6, 2.6-5.5, and 3.6, respectively. The review emphasizes the need for standardized imaging protocols and DRLs in pediatric CT examinations to optimize radiation doses and patient safety. It recommends the development of annually reviewed comprehensive national DRLs in Saudi Arabia and improved training for technologists and physicians involved in pediatric CT imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.