ArticleCureus2024
Posture Estimation Model Combined With Machine Learning Estimates the Radial Abduction Angle of the Thumb With High Accuracy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate estimation of hip range of motion using MediaPipe and inertial sensors with machine learning models.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Telemedicine: Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- Proof of Concept and Validation of Single-Camera AI-Assisted Live Thumb Motion Capture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accuracy of the Automated Range of Motion Observer and Reporter Software for Fully Automated Joint Measurement From Patient Videos.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thumb function is complex, and accurate evaluation through images or videos is difficult. Pose estimation, a technology that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to estimate skeletal detection of the body, is gaining popularity. In this study, we combined the pose estimation library MediaPipe-Hands and five machine learning (ML) models to predict the radial abduction angle of the thumb. Radial abduction movements of 20 hands from 10 healthy volunteers were captured on video and processed into 5,000 images. Angle measurements by goniometer were used as true values to evaluate the angle reliability of the MediaPipe-Hands and the angle reliability of the MediaPipe-Hands combined with ML. The correlation coefficient (CC) between the angle measured by goniometry and the angle calculated by MediaPipe-Hands was 0.84. In contrast, applying ML to MediaPipe-Hands resulted in models with improved accuracy, and all models showed high CCs (0.94-099) with angle measurements taken by goniometry. The ML model also predicted the abduction angles when the camera was taken from three different angles. In visualizing the features that the AI deemed important, the ML model predicted the abduction angle by focusing on the tip distance between the thumb and index finger along with the angle of the metacarpophalangeal joint between the thumb and middle finger. These results enable angle estimation even without frontal imaging with a camera, and expansion of this system may lead to real-time functional assessment in telemedicine and rehabilitation without the need for physical contact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.