ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2024
Dynamic strain and β-catenin mediated suppression of interferon responsive genes in quiescent mesenchymal stromal/stem cells.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechano-metabolic axis involves mitochondrial responses via BMP/Smad regulatory effect on cyclophilin D.Bone research · 2026Article
- Macrophage-MSCs Interplay in Orthodontic Bone Remodelling: Mechanics-Immunity-Stem Cell Axis.International dental journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multipotent bone marrow mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) respond to mechanical forces. MSCs perceive static and dynamic forces through focal adhesions, as well as cytoskeletal and intranuclear actin. Dynamic strain stimulates nuclear β-catenin (Ctnnb1) that controls gene expression and suppresses osteogenesis. The sensitivity of MSCs to external mechanical forces may be altered by cessation of proliferation, when MSCs begin to express extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and generate cell/cell contact. Therefore, we assessed whether and how gene expression of proliferating versus quiescent MSCs responds to mechanical stimuli. We used RNA-seq and RT-qPCR to evaluate transcriptomes at 3 h after dynamic strain (200 cycles × 2 % for 20 min) once daily during a two-day time course in naïve (uninduced) MSCs. Transcriptomes of untreated MSCs show that cells become quiescent at day 2 when proliferation markers are downregulated, and ECM related genes are upregulated. On both day 1 and day 2, dynamic strain stimulates expression of oxidative stress related genes (e.g., Nqo1, Prl2c2, Prl2c3). Strikingly, in quiescent MSCs, we observe that dynamic strain suppresses multiple interferon (IFN) responsive genes (e.g., Irf7, Oasl2 and Isg15). IFN responsive genes are activated in MSCs depleted of β-catenin using siRNAs, indicating that β-catenin normally suppresses these genes. Our data indicate that the functional effects of dynamic strain and β-catenin on IFN responsive genes in MSCs are mechanistically coupled. Because dynamic strain and β-catenin reduce the osteogenic potential of MSCs, our findings suggest that IFN responsive genes are novel biomarkers and potential regulators of mechanical responses at early stages of lineage-commitment in post-proliferative MSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.