SynthesisFrontiers in genetics2024
Bibliometric analysis of genomic selection in breeding of animal from 1993 to 2024: global trends and advancements.
Synthesis in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative artificial intelligence in animal genomics for smart agriculture: Applications, challenges, and future prospects.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Research Trends and Emerging Frontiers in Racehorse Genetics: A Bibliometric Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Greenhouse gas sequestration in poultry farming: Strategies for sustainable production and environmental impact mitigation.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Comparative detection of selection signatures in indigenous and crossbred Turkish sheep breeds.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal breeding became a difficult science when numerous genes influenced economically significant features. The major source of genetic improvement is selection, and as such, the large generation intervals in these strategies lead to reduced rates of improvement. Therefore, breeding control, genetic improvement research, and selection processes are accelerated by genomic selection. This article regarding global research interest trends in genomic selection in animal breeding themes was examined using bibliometric analysis, which employed papers from 1993 to 2024 from the SCI-Expanded, SSCI, AHCI, and E-SCI indexes. Over the period of 31 years, the first 3,181 published articles on genomic selection in animal breeding were gathered. Additionally, the study displays trends in co-authorships according to nations and academic institutions as well as co-occurrences of author keywords. There have been more articles since 2010 about the use of genomic selection in animal breeding, building up a sizable library of work that will last until 2024. Among the top academics in the field are Calus MPL, Li J, and Wang Y. The most productive institutions were The United Kingdom's University of Edinburgh, Aarhus University (Denmark) and China Agricultural University. The current hotspots in this field of study include "selection," and "association," according to keyword co-occurrence and frequency analysis. China, the United States, Brazil, Canada, and United Kingdom are the top five countries that produced the most papers with the highest levels of international collaboration and networking. The main topics of current study include prediction, accuracy, association, traits, and selection. New techniques for selection, prediction, accuracy, traits, and association were developed as the discipline matured. Research collaborations across countries, institutions, and writers promote knowledge sharing, effective issue resolution, and superior outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.