Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512786›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025

Transcranial direct current stimulation and its effect on cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia: An updated review.

Sadia Rehman Safwi, Abid Rizvi, Mohammad Amir Usmani, Karrar Husain, Kanwarjeet Brar, Deep Yadava

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sadia Rehman SafwiYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abid RizviDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University, USA.
Mohammad Amir UsmaniAlbert J. Solnit Children's Center, Middletown, CT, USA.
Karrar HusainTexas Tech University Health Science Center at Permian Basin, TX, USA.
Kanwarjeet BrarMindpath Health, Manteca, CA, USA.
Deep YadavaDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive impairments in schizophrenia significantly affect functional outcomes and quality of life. This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an intervention for cognitive deficits in individuals with schizophrenia. Methods: From May 20 to June 15, 2024, a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials was conducted. After applying eligibility criteria, 13 randomized sham-controlled trials were included, involving 261 participants in the tDCS group and 247 in the sham group. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was computed to measure the effect size of cognitive outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. Results: The pooled analysis yielded an SMD of 0.09 (95 % CI: -0.17 to 0.35), indicating a non-significant difference between tDCS and sham on cognitive outcomes. Moderate heterogeneity (I Conclusions: This meta-analysis underscores the lack of significant evidence for tDCS in improving cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. The findings highlight the urgent need for standardizing tDCS protocols and employing domain-specific cognitive assessments. This standardization, along with the collection of more domain-specific data, is crucial for future research and the improvement of current methodologies.

Indexed as

Cognitive symptomsDomain-specific improvementsMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialsSchizophreniaTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39512786
PMCPMC11541428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.