SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
Impacts of completely endophytic renal masses on perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-assisted versus non-robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in ambulatory mode: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A Novel Imaging-Guided Classification System for Completely Endophytic Renal Tumors: Strategies for Optimal Partial Nephrectomy and Clinical Outcome Comparison.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive pooled analysis aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between completely endophytic tumors (CERT) and non-completely endophytic tumors (non-CERT). Methods: This study adhered rigorously to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, focusing on studies published in English up to May 2024. Our analysis primarily evaluated key outcomes, specifically perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes. Results: A total of 2126 patients across six studies were included in the analysis. Compared to non-CERT, CERT was associated with significantly higher rates of major complications (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.14 to 5.34; p = 0.02), longer warm ischemia times (Weighted Mean Difference [WMD]: 3.27 min; 95% CI: 0.61 to 5.39; p = 0.02), a greater decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (WMD: 2.93 ml/min/1.73 m Conclusions: Although CERT was associated with greater declines in eGFR and lower rates of trifecta achievement, it yielded perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes comparable to those of non-CERT in RAPN. Our findings suggest that RAPN for completely endophytic renal masses can achieve acceptable outcomes when performed in centers with substantial expertise in robotic surgery. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=555067, identifier CRD42024555067.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.