Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512760›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2024

A survey of the experiences of delivering physiotherapy services through telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tzu-Hsuan Peng, Janice J Eng, Anne Harris, Catherine Le Cornu Levett, Jennifer Yao, Amy Schneeberg, Courtney L Pollock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tzu-Hsuan PengDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Janice J EngDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Anne HarrisGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Catherine Le Cornu LevettGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jennifer YaoCentre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amy SchneebergDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Courtney L PollockDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Physiotherapy services have been typically provided in-person since the profession usually involves a therapist providing hands-on assessment and treatments. The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to study physiotherapists' adaptation to telerehabilitation (phone or videoconference). Objective: This study aimed: (1) to explore how physiotherapists adapted to the transition to delivering telerehabilitation, (2) to assess physiotherapists' perceptions of implementing telerehabilitation, and (3) to identify the challenges and facilitators of delivering telerehabilitation. Methods: This study used an online survey distributed to physiotherapists within a large Canadian health authority. Closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: Seventy-five physiotherapists responded and data were collected. Compared prior to the pandemic to time during the pandemic, the use of a phone for delivering physiotherapy increased from 24.0% to 73.3% of physiotherapists while videoconference increased from 5.3% to 77.3%. Overall, the physiotherapists found videoconference to be a more effective delivery method than phone. Less than half felt that they could use videoconference to effectively treat pain (49.3%), upper extremity function (40.0%) or strength/range of motion (48.0%). Only 29.3% felt that they could effectively treat walking balance or mobility by videoconference. Technical barriers were identified with client comfort with the equipment reported by 90.7% of physiotherapists and positioning of the webcam by 76.0% of physiotherapists. A large proportion of physiotherapists agreed that they would continue the practice of telerehabilitation via phone (54.7%) and videoconference (68.0%). Conclusion: The pandemic resulted in a dramatic shift to telerehabilitation for a profession that typically provides hands-on assessments and treatments. While there was increased uptake of telerehabilitation, many physiotherapists questioned their effectiveness using telerehabilitation to undertake activities that traditionally involve manual treatments or hands-on guidance/supervision. However, physiotherapists were committed to continuing telerehabilitation to meet patients' needs after the pandemic.

Indexed as

clinicians experienceCOVID-19 pandemicphysiotherapytelehealthtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39512760
PMCPMC11540677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.