ArticleRegenerative therapy2024
In situ forming Hydrogel with adding ZnO Nano-particle for effectively methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infected frostbite injury.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of platelet rich plasma and zinc oxide nanoparticle on skin wound healing in dogs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- pH-responsive bilayer hydrogel with sequential release of morin-based nanoparticles and bFGF for the treatment of the "ice and fire" wounds.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogel has emerged as a promising wound dressing material, and in situ forming hydrogel has emerged as a promising wound dressing recently. But most in situ forming hydrogel are normally unstable. Herein, we report an in-situ forming hydrogel synthesized from poly(Nisopropylacrylamide166- Materials and methods: Thirty rats were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group received hydrogel and transparent film dressing 30 min to 1 h post-burn, while the control group received only cotton dressing. The wound area was measured, and the wound closure rate was calculated on days 3, 7, and 14 post-surgery. Tissue samples were collected from each rat on these days and stored at -80 °C for histological analysis using H&E, Masson and immunohistochemical staining. This analysis assessed factors such as granulation tissue length, re-epithelialization, re-angiogenesis, collagen deposition, inflammatory cell infiltration, and collagen production. Clinical and histological assessments at 14 days showed more rapid healing in the hydrogel dressing group compared to the control group. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the design of our hydrogel for cooling injury wounds effectively improves healing and mitigates the damage from low temperatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.