Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512658›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Development and evaluation of a soft pneumatic muscle for elbow joint rehabilitation.

Mostafa Orban, Kai Guo, Caijun Luo, Hongbo Yang, Karim Badr, Mahmoud Elsamanty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mostafa OrbanSchool of Biomedical Engineering (Suzhou), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Kai GuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering (Suzhou), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Caijun LuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering (Suzhou), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Hongbo YangSchool of Biomedical Engineering (Suzhou), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Karim BadrMechanical Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mahmoud ElsamantyMechanical Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elbow joint rehabilitation presents a formidable challenge, underscored by the joint's complex biomechanics and high vulnerability to injuries and degenerative conditions. Despite the advancements in rehabilitative technology, current solutions such as rigid exoskeletons often fall short in providing the precision, flexibility, and customization needed for effective treatment. Although traditional robotic aids, such as rigid exoskeletons, help recover, they lack in providing sufficient flexibility, comfort, and easy customization with no need for complicated calculation and complex design considerations. The introduction of soft pneumatic muscles marks a significant development in the rehabilitation technologies field, offering distinct advantages and unique challenges when compared to conventional rigid systems. These flexible actuators closely mimic the elasticity of biological tissues, improving safety and interaction between humans and machines. Designed for individualized therapy, its versatility allows application in various rehabilitation scenarios, from clinical settings to home settings. The novelty of this approach lies in the development of biomechanically-compliant soft pneumatic muscles optimized for precise rotational control of the elbow joint, coupled with an advanced deep learning-based motion tracking system. This design overcomes limitations in force control, stability, and pressure requirements found in existing pneumatic-based systems, improving the safety and efficacy of elbow rehabilitation. In this study, the design, fabrication and systematic evaluation of a soft pneumatic muscle for elbow rehabilitation are presented. The device is designed to closely simulate the complex biomechanical movements of the elbow, with a primary focus on the rotational motions that are essential for controlling flexion and extension, as well as positioning the wrist during grasping tasks. Through the integration of precise geometric parameters, the actuator is capable of controlled flexion and extension, reflecting the natural kinematics of the elbow. Employing a rigorous methodology, the research integrates finite element analysis with empirical testing to refine the actuator's performance. Under varying air pressures, the soft muscle demonstrated remarkable deformation along the X-axis (10-150 mm) and the Y-axis, indicative of its symmetrical rotational behavior, while maintaining minimal elongation along the Z-axis (0.003 mm max), and proper lifiting force under a maximum wight of 470 gm. highlighting the stability and targeted response of the device to pneumatic actuation. A specialized experimental apparatus comprising a 3D environment, a pneumatic circuit, a LabVIEW-based control system, and a deep learning algorithm was developed for accurate position estimation. The algorithm achieved a high predictive accuracy of 99.8% in spatial coordination tracking, indicating the precision of the system in monitoring and controlling the actuator's motion.

Indexed as

biomechanical simulationdeep learningelbow rehabilitationfinite element analysis (FEA)kinematic analysismotion trackingpneumatic actuatorssoft robotics

Identifiers

PMID39512658
PMCPMC11541107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.