ArticleDental research journal2024
Cytotoxicity of dental ceramic materials on human gingival fibroblasts.
Article in Dental research journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular dynamics simulation of polymerization kinetics, dimensional stability, and in silico toxicity of nextgeneration silicone impression materials in dentistry.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of new computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing all-ceramic materials on the viability and adhesion properties of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs). Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, the proliferation and adhesion potential of the cells were evaluated by seeding the HGF cells on rectangular samples ( Results: The highest percentage of cell viability after 24 h, 72 h, and 168 h cultures was related to ZLS, LDS, and CZr, respectively. The lowest proliferation of fibroblast cells was shown in ZLS compared to other groups. SEM analysis showed that the CZr and LDS groups have better adhesion patterns and morphology. The surface of HyC groups was significantly less rough than other groups. Regarding the water wetting angle (wettability), the TZr and CZr showed significantly larger angles. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that CZr and LDS ceramics had better adhesion patterns and typical morphology. On the other hand, zirconia with a larger wetting angle can reduce the chance of bacteria adhesion to the surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39512582PMC11542751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.