Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512577›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Confirmatory validation of a brief patient-reported outcome measure assessing psychological distress in caregivers of malignant mesothelioma patients: the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Caregivers.

Antonella Granieri, Isabella Giulia Franzoi, Maria Domenica Sauta, Alessandro Marinaccio, Carolina Mensi, Sabrina Rugarli, Enrica Migliore, Ilaria Cozzi, Domenica Cavone, Luigi Vimercati and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk of employment separation among workers with head and neck cancer: a longitudinal cohort study in Turin.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Antonella GranieriDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Isabella Giulia FranzoiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Maria Domenica SautaDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro MarinaccioOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Italy.
Carolina MensiCOR Lombardy, Occupational Health Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sabrina RugarliCOR Lombardy, Occupational Health Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Enrica MiglioreCOR Piedmont, Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, CPO Piedmont and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Ilaria CozziCOR Lazio, Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Local Health Unit 1, Rome, Italy.
Domenica CavoneSection of Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Regional Operating Center of Puglia (COR Puglia), University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Luigi VimercatiSection of Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Regional Operating Center of Puglia (COR Puglia), University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Federica GrossoMesothelioma and Rare Cancers Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Marinella BertolottiResearch Training Innovation Infrastructure, Research and Innovation Department (DAIRI), AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Giulia RaimondiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco InnamoratiDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Michela BonafedeOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma (MM) can be devastating for both patients and caregivers, who may experience intense suffering from a physical, psychological, and interpersonal perspective. Despite the extensive literature on caregiver distress, there is a lack of validated measures to provide evidence of psychological distress of caregivers of MM patients. Therefore, in a previous study we developed the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Caregivers (MPDT-C) to evaluate the specific profile of psychological distress in this population. This paper describes the item selection, factor analysis, and psychometric evaluation of the revised MPDT-C. Methods: The analyses of this work first aimed to confirm the previous factorial structure. In the case of nonfit, it aimed to find an alternative structure and causes of nonfit in the model. Examination of the fit of the factorial model was conducted using a Bayesian approach. Results: The final version of the MPDT-C is a 7-item self-report questionnaire consisting of one factor (Burden for the caregiver). Conclusion: Having a short self-report questionnaire to assess the psychological distress experienced by caregivers of MM patients has several advantages. First, it is suited to epidemiological studies where multiple variables and measures are involved. Second, it is easy to administer and does not take much time to complete. Therefore, the MPDT-C can also be administered in clinical contexts, perhaps when MM patients attend follow-up medical evaluation. Lastly, short measures are less affected by cognitive fatigue, which is very common in a long battery of tests and could affect response reliability.

Indexed as

burdencancercaregivermesotheliomaoccupational canceroncologypatient-reported outcome measurespsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID39512577
PMCPMC11541108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.