ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science
Diagnostic evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in predicting elevated intracranial pressure among neurocritically ill patients: A prospective observational study.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is used as a surrogate for intracranial pressure (ICP) with a marked variation in its optimal cutoff in various subgroups of neurocritical illnesses. Real-world data on ultrasound (US)-ONSD performance among a diverse population and its trend corresponding with clinical deterioration are scarce. We aim to determine the diagnostic performance of ONSD compared to computed tomography (CT) in predicting elevated ICP in a mixed population of neurocritical patients. Methods: Baseline ONSD measurements (T1) using B-mode US were recorded among eligible patients. Follow-up ONSD (T2) was recorded during clinical deterioration defined by ≥2 drops in Glasgow Coma Scale/Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (GCS/FOUR) scores. Its diagnostic performance in predicting elevated ICP was assessed by comparing it with the concurrently taken CT findings as a reference standard. The difference between the two ONSD measurements was termed delta ONSD. Results: In the final analysis, 129 participants were included. The population comprised traumatic brain injury, stroke (hemorrhagic and ischemic), intracranial space-occupying lesions, and other medical conditions. The optimal ONSD (T2) cutoff of 5.23 mm had a diagnostic accuracy of 80.73% to predict elevated ICP (sensitivity: 82%; specificity: 78%; area under the curve: 0.88; and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.819-0.941). Each unit increase in delta ONSD was associated with increased odds of need for surgical intervention (odds ratio [OR]: 3.91; 95% CI: 1.31-12.6, Conclusions: ONSD cutoff of 5.23 mm has a good diagnostic accuracy in predicting elevated ICP compared to CT during clinical deterioration. ONSD measurements correlate well with corresponding GCS/FOUR scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.