ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science
Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study intended to assess the quality of life (QOL) with telephonic interview using the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Scale in follow-up patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: This prospective, noninterventional follow-up study was conducted at a tertiary care center. COVID-19 pneumonia patients discharged from ICU were recruited for telephonic interviews. Interviews were performed using SF-12 Scale to assess QOL 6 months after discharge. The SF-12 survey measures general health status in eight domains. A radar chart was used for the interpretation of health component scores. Results: One hundred and fifty patients could complete the telephonic interview. The first-stage depression risk was 50%, which was 30% more than general position incidence (20%). As compared to the general population, physical component summary (PCS-12) was 60% below and mental component summary (MCS-12) was 67% below the general norm. Role emotional was the most affected followed by role physical. Conclusions: QOL in follow-up ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was worse in terms of physical and mental scores. By employing a comprehensive, longitudinal assessment of QOL in follow-up patients, using validated SF-12 Scale, this study captures a multifaceted view of their health status postrecovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.