ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2024
Exploring the perspectives of female cancer patients on the donation of reproductive cells for fertility preservation and research purposes.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical perspectives of fertility preservation through experts' opinions.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- IVF outcomes in cancer survivors: lower ovarian response and early embryo development but comparable success in frozen embryo transfer cycles - a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Ethics of non-oncological fertility preservation from the perspective of the four principles of bioethics.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations and management strategies for fertility preservation in women of reproductive age with malignant tumors: Chinese practices and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to explore the opinions of female cancer patients regarding the donation of cancer and reproductive cells for reproductive and research purposes. Material and methods: The study involved 373 female cancer patients from 2 hospitals with oncology departments in Poznan, Poland. They completed a pen-and-paper questionnaire-based survey. Results: While most female cancer patients declared their willingness to donate cancer tissues for fertility research (87.9%), they were reluctant to share their reproductive cells for research purposes (82.3%). Additionally, 88.2% of respondents were unwilling to donate embryos that remain after in vitro treatment for research purposes. Simultaneously, 57.1% of woman supported the preservation of fertility cells, 62.5% believed it should be ethically and legally regulated in Poland, and 74% believed it should be re-imbursed by the National Health Fund. Women's opinions were linked to their age, education, place of residence, family status, and declared religiosity. Conclusions: Because most female cancer patients expressed their willingness to share their reproductive cells for reproductive purposes and believed that the preservation of cells for fertility purposes should be reimbursed by the State, there is a need for doctors and nurses to inform patients about the available ways to preserve fertility. However, because donation of reproductive cells for biomedical research raises many concerns, healthcare professionals should be trained to discuss with patients the ethical and legal issues related to fertility preservation and biomedical research involving reproductive cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.