Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512534›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2024

The utility of the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score

Michał Jarząb, Maria Litwiniuk, Paige Innis, Aleksandra Łacko, Gesine Enderle, Bogumiła Czartoryska-Arłukowicz, Małgorzata Talerczyk, Joanna Streb, Piotr Wysocki, Grażyna Suchodolska and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michał JarząbBreast Cancer Centre, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Maria LitwiniukDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Immuno-oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland.
Paige InnisExact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Aleksandra ŁackoLower Silesian Oncology Centre, Medical University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
Gesine EnderleExact Sciences International GmbH, Baar, Switzerland.
Bogumiła Czartoryska-ArłukowiczM. Skłodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, Białystok, Poland.
Małgorzata TalerczykWest Pomeranian Oncology Centre in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Joanna StrebDepartment of Oncology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Piotr WysockiDepartment of Oncology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Grażyna SuchodolskaDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Bartosz SzymanowskiDepartment of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Renata DuchnowskaDepartment of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is among the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumours in females. The optimal treatment of early HR+, HER2-, and lymph node-negative (N0) BC remains challenging. Since individual assessment of recurrence risk and expected benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) based on clinicopathological features alone appear inadequate, gene expression profiling tests have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Material and methods: The PONDx survey investigated the real-life use of Oncotype DX Breast RS in 204 pa- tients with HR+, HER2-, N0 BC in 8 clinical reference centres in Poland. Data on clinicopathological features and changes in treatment based on the Oncotype DX Breast RS test were collected. Results: Chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (ET) was initially recommended in 44.8% and ET alone in 55.2% of patients. After the introduction of recurrence score results, the recommendation for CT decreased significantly: relative reduction of 25.5% (95% CI: 11.7-52.3) and absolute reduction of 11.4% (95% CI: 1.9-21.0). Among patients initially recommended for CT, treatment was de-escalated in 62.2%; conversely, among patients initially recommended for ET alone, 29.7% were escalated to CT after testing. The relative reduction was especially pronounced in post-menopausal patients (29.6%) and in those with lobular BC (42.9%). Conclusions: The Oncotype DX Breast RS result significantly influenced treatment decisions, with 44.3% of patients changing treatment, thus avoiding overtreatment or undertreatment. The Oncotype DX Breast RS test improves patient management and increases physician confidence in treatment recommendations.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapybreast cancerOncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score®real life study

Identifiers

PMID39512534
PMCPMC11538975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.