ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2024
The utility of the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Deep learning on histopathological images to predict breast cancer recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit: a multicentre, model development and validation study.The Lancet. Oncology · 2026Article
- Genomic tests to guide management of breast cancer in Europe: regulation, reimbursement, adoption, and challenges.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Deep Learning on Histopathological Images to Predict Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk and Chemotherapy Benefit.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is among the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumours in females. The optimal treatment of early HR+, HER2-, and lymph node-negative (N0) BC remains challenging. Since individual assessment of recurrence risk and expected benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) based on clinicopathological features alone appear inadequate, gene expression profiling tests have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Material and methods: The PONDx survey investigated the real-life use of Oncotype DX Breast RS in 204 pa- tients with HR+, HER2-, N0 BC in 8 clinical reference centres in Poland. Data on clinicopathological features and changes in treatment based on the Oncotype DX Breast RS test were collected. Results: Chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (ET) was initially recommended in 44.8% and ET alone in 55.2% of patients. After the introduction of recurrence score results, the recommendation for CT decreased significantly: relative reduction of 25.5% (95% CI: 11.7-52.3) and absolute reduction of 11.4% (95% CI: 1.9-21.0). Among patients initially recommended for CT, treatment was de-escalated in 62.2%; conversely, among patients initially recommended for ET alone, 29.7% were escalated to CT after testing. The relative reduction was especially pronounced in post-menopausal patients (29.6%) and in those with lobular BC (42.9%). Conclusions: The Oncotype DX Breast RS result significantly influenced treatment decisions, with 44.3% of patients changing treatment, thus avoiding overtreatment or undertreatment. The Oncotype DX Breast RS test improves patient management and increases physician confidence in treatment recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.