Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512514›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2024

Construction and validation of an instrument to identify barriers to implementing pharmaceutical care.

Luanna Gabriella Resende da Silva, Rúbia Yumi Murakami Silva, Mariana Linhares Pereira, Maria Teresa Herdeiro, André Oliveira Baldoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luanna Gabriella Resende da SilvaClinical Pharmacy Teaching and Research Center (NEPeFaC). Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Brazil.
Rúbia Yumi Murakami SilvaClinical Pharmacy Teaching and Research Center (NEPeFaC). Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Brazil.
Mariana Linhares PereiraClinical Pharmacy Teaching and Research Center (NEPeFaC). Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Brazil.
Maria Teresa HerdeiroDepartment of Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro. Adress: Campus Universitário de Santiago - Agra do Crasto: Edifício 30, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
André Oliveira BaldoniClinical Pharmacy Teaching and Research Center (NEPeFaC). Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical Care is a professional practice in high demand for implementation in Primary Health Care within the Public Health System. Consequently, it was necessary to develop and validate an instrument to assess the obstacles to this process. Methods: A methodological study was conducted in three stages: first, the questionnaire was developed based on the APOTECA framework, which includes Attitudinal, Political, Technical, and Administrative domains. Second, the content was validated using the Delphi Technique, with a content validity coefficient greater than or equal to 0.8 considered acceptable. Third, a pre-test was conducted with pharmacists working in Primary Health Care within the Public Health System. After validation, the instrument was administered to pharmacists participating in a training and support project for the implementation of Pharmaceutical Care. Results: The results indicated that the instrument was validated after two rounds of evaluation, with the first round involving 33 experts achieving a total content validity coefficient of 96 %, and the second round involving 18 experts achieving a total content validity coefficient of 98 %. In the third stage, the pre-test with Primary Health Care pharmacists resulted in a total content validity coefficient of 91 %. The final version of the questionnaire, which incorporated suggestions for improvements, included 19 questions. When answered by pharmacists, the responses indicated that Technical questions were the most significant barrier to implementation, followed by Political, Attitudinal, and Administrative questions. Conclusion: The validation of this instrument provides an important tool for identifying factors that hinder the implementation of Pharmaceutical Care within the Public Health System.

Indexed as

Evidence-based pharmaceutical practicePharmaceutical carePublic health systemValidation study

Identifiers

PMID39512514
PMCPMC11541423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.