Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512501›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2025

Single‑center, retrospective, evaluator‑blinded, pilot and pivotal clinical trials: Assessing the mirCaP Kit (hsv2‑miR‑H9/hsa‑miR‑3659) as a diagnostic marker for prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels in the gray zone.

Won Tae Kim, Kyeong Kim, Ho Won Kang, Young Joon Byun, Xuan-Mei Piao, Yong-June Kim, Sang Cheol Lee, Seok Joong Yun, Yun-Sok Ha, Jiyeon Kim and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Won Tae KimDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Kyeong KimDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Ho Won KangDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Young Joon ByunDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Xuan-Mei PiaoDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Yong-June KimDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Sang Cheol LeeDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Seok Joong YunDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Sok HaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, North Gyeongsang 41404, Republic of Korea.
Jiyeon KimDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Isaac Yi KimDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains a key biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer (PCa). For patients within the 'PSA gray zone', the positive predictive value (PPV) of PSA for PCa detection by biopsy is estimated to be between 30 and 42%. In the present study, a single-center, retrospective, evaluator-blinded, pilot and pivotal clinical trial was performed to assess the clinical performance of the mirCaP kit (Urotech, Inc.), which measures the herpes simplex virus 2-microRNA (miR)-H9/hsa-miR-3659 ratio, with respect to helping physicians make appropriate decisions regarding further assessment of patients with PSA levels within this gray zone. For the patients in the initial clinical trial group who were in the PSA gray zone, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and negative predictive value (NPV) of the mirCaP kit were 94.29, 77.50, 85.33, 78.57 and 93.94%, respectively. For those in the pivotal clinical trial, these values were 94.50, 82.73, 87.90, 81.10 and 95.04%, respectively. These results suggest that the mirCaP kit may be an effective non-invasive diagnostic marker for PCa in patients with PSA levels in the gray zone. Thus, the mirCaP kit is a promising tool that can help physicians make a decision regarding the need for prostate biopsy in these patients. Of note, the NPV of >90% indicates that the mirCaP kit could prevent unnecessary prostate biopsies in >90% of these cases.

Indexed as

biomarkersdiagnosismicroRNAsprostatic neoplasmsurine

Identifiers

PMID39512501
PMCPMC11542165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.