ArticleHeliyon2024
Agricultural trade liberalization, governance quality, and technical efficiency in the agricultural sector of Southeast Asia.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of institutional quality, energy consumption, and trade openness in food production in major 19 agricultural economies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Coordinated Development and Spatiotemporal Evolution Trends of China's Agricultural Trade and Production from the Perspective of Food Security.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
International trade has been regarded as an essential factor in enhancing a country's productivity and efficiency. Nevertheless, developing countries squander money and resources as a result of their deficient institutional quality, impeding their ability to profit from specialization and trade. Therefore, this study intends to investigate the impact of agricultural trade liberalization and governance quality on technical efficiency in Southeast Asia's agricultural sector using balanced panel data spanning from 2002 to 2021. The research utilizes translog stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) with a single-stage maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to simultaneously calculate the time-varying technical efficiency scores and explore the core factors influencing agricultural inefficiency. The findings reveal that the average output-oriented technical efficiency for ASEAN-8 countries was 94 %. This suggests that there is significant potential to enhance technical efficiency in agricultural production by up to 6 % by addressing the adverse impacts of technical inefficiency. The research findings further point out that Malaysia is the most technically efficient country, having a technical efficiency score of 99.82 %, followed by Vietnam (99.75 %), Thailand (99.70 %), Lao PDR (98.90 %), Myanmar (95.42 %), Indonesia (91.64 %), the Philippines (90.65 %), and Cambodia (76.11 %). The results of disaggregated agricultural trade liberalization demonstrate a significant reduction in agricultural inefficiency in Southeast Asia through agricultural exports and imports. The findings also emphasize that improvements in the rule of law positively contribute to agricultural efficiency, whereas enhancements in terms of voice and accountability and regulatory quality appear to reduce it. Based on these findings, the government should consider enlarging open and liberalized trade policies in order to facilitate the exchange of technology and knowledge within the agriculture sector. Additionally, the government should involve farmers, agricultural cooperatives, local communities, and other relevant stakeholders in the decision-making process to ensure that policies address the specific needs and constraints faced by the sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.