ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024
BrainNet: an automated approach for brain stress prediction utilizing electrodermal activity signal with XLNet model.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining the Use of Consumer Wearable Devices and Digital Tools for Stress Measurement in College Students: Scoping Review of Methods.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain stress monitoring has emerged as a critical research area for understanding and managing stress and neurological health issues. This burgeoning field aims to provide accurate information and prediction about individuals' stress levels by analyzing behavioral data and physiological signals. To address this emerging problem, this research study proposes an innovative approach that uses an attention mechanism-based XLNet model (called BrainNet) for continuous stress monitoring and stress level prediction. The proposed model analyzes streams of brain data, including behavioral and physiological signal patterns using Swell and WESAD datasets. Testing on the Swell multi-class dataset, the model achieves an impressive accuracy of 95.76%. Furthermore, when evaluated on the WESAD dataset, it demonstrates even higher accuracy, reaching 98.32%. When applied to the binary classification of stress and no stress using the Swell dataset, the model achieves an outstanding accuracy of 97.19%. Comparative analysis with other previously published research studies underscores the superior performance of the proposed approach. In addition, cross-validation confirms the significance, efficacy, and robustness of the model in brain stress level prediction and aligns with the goals of smart diagnostics for understanding neurological behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.