ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
IgG1 versus IgG3: influence of antibody-specificity and allotypic variance on virus neutralization efficacy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycan-reactive antibodies isolated from human HIV-1 vaccine trial participants show broad pathogen cross-reactivity.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Neutralizing Antibodies vs. Viruses: Interacting Mechanisms and Escape Tactics.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Light Chain Isotype and Antibody-Specificity Impact on Virus Neutralization.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Different Fc scaffolds enhance the breadth ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the unique advantages of IgG3 over other IgG subclasses, such as mediating enhanced effector functions and increased flexibility in antigen binding due to a long hinge region, the therapeutic potential of IgG3 remains largely unexplored. This may be attributed to difficulties in recombinant expression and the reduced plasma half-life of most IgG3 allotypes. Here, we report plant expression of two SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that exhibit high (P5C3) and low (H4) antigen binding. P5C3 and H4-IgG1 mAbs were subclass-switched to IgG3 formats, designed for efficient production and increased PK values, carrying three allotypic variations, referred to as -WT, -H, and -KVH. A total of eight mAbs were produced in glycoengineered plants that synthesize fucose-free complex N-glycans with great homogeneity. Antigen, IgG-FcγR immune complex and complement binding studies demonstrated similar activities of all mAbs. In accordance, P5C3 Abs showed minor alterations in SARS-CoV-2 neutralization (NT) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated virus inhibition (ADCVI). Clear functional differences were observed between H4 variants with superior ADCVI and NT potencies of H4 IgG3 H. Our comparative study demonstrates the production of an IgG3 variant carrying an Fc domain with equivalent or enhanced functions compared to IgG3-WT, but with the stability and PK values of IgG1. Our data also demonstrate that both allotypic variability and antibody specificity are important for fine-tuning of activities, an important information for the development of future therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.