ReviewBiophysics reviews2024
AI-integrated network for RNA complex structure and dynamic prediction.
Review in Biophysics reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Vesicles: Classification, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Therapeutic Opportunities.MedComm · 2026Review
- YBX1 as an adaptive RNA hub in cancer: linking state-dependent RNA regulation to tumor immunity, metabolic reprogramming, and therapy resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- LncRNA-Protein Interactions: A Key to Deciphering LncRNA Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Decoding RNA-Protein Interactions: Methodological Advances and Emerging Challenges.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Decoding the effects of mutation on protein interactions using machine learning.Biophysics reviews · 2025Review
- RNA-protein interaction prediction using network-guided deep learning.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Molecular Dynamics of Apolipoprotein Genotypes APOE4 and SNARE Family Proteins and Their Impact on Alzheimer's Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances and Mechanisms of RNA-Ligand Interaction Predictions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA complexes are essential components in many cellular processes. The functions of these complexes are linked to their tertiary structures, which are shaped by detailed interface information, such as binding sites, interface contact, and dynamic conformational changes. Network-based approaches have been widely used to analyze RNA complex structures. With their roots in the graph theory, these methods have a long history of providing insight into the static and dynamic properties of RNA molecules. These approaches have been effective in identifying functional binding sites and analyzing the dynamic behavior of RNA complexes. Recently, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought transformative changes to the field. These technologies have been increasingly applied to studying RNA complex structures, providing new avenues for understanding the complex interactions within RNA complexes. By integrating AI with traditional network analysis methods, researchers can build more accurate models of RNA complex structures, predict their dynamic behaviors, and even design RNA-based inhibitors. In this review, we introduce the integration of network-based methodologies with AI techniques to enhance the understanding of RNA complex structures. We examine how these advanced computational tools can be used to model and analyze the detailed interface information and dynamic behaviors of RNA molecules. Additionally, we explore the potential future directions of how AI-integrated networks can aid in the modeling and analyzing RNA complex structures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.