Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512326›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A robust LightGBM model for concrete tensile strength forecast to aid in resilience-based structure strategies.

Chukwuemeka Daniel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chukwuemeka DanielPan African University Institute of Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tensile strength (TS) of concrete is a factor in the design of civil engineering structures. Traditional methods for assessing concrete TS have notable limitations, leading to the emergence of non-destructive testing (NDT) as an innovative alternative. This study introduces a novel, optimized approach for accurate, non-destructive TS prediction by integrating Gradio, Bayesian optimization (BO), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The input parameters for the model were ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and electrical resistivity (ER). Using a comprehensive dataset of 3460 datapoints, a light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM) model was developed. Through extensive hyperparameter tuning facilitated by BO, the model achieved a robust prediction accuracy of approximately 98 %. The novel application of SHAP in this study provided deep insights into model behavior, confirming UPV as the most critical variable for TS prediction. The deployment of the model using Gradio further enhances its accessibility and usability. This combined methodology not only advances the application of machine learning (ML) in civil engineering but also offers a powerful, globally applicable tool for accurately forecasting concrete TS. This supports resilience-based management strategies, essential for the sustainable development of infrastructure. The study's novel integration of BO for optimization and SHAP for interpretability marks a significant step forward in the precise prediction of TS, offering practical benefits for both researchers and industry professionals.

Indexed as

LightGBMNon-destructive testsSHAPTensile strength

Identifiers

PMID39512326
PMCPMC11541690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.