ArticlePeerJ2024
Dietary reference intake for military operations: a scoping review.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping smart technologies and nutritional strategies for monitoring cognitive resilience in military personnel under extreme operational conditions: a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Energy Expenditure of Special Forces Soldiers in Relation to Equipment Load and Movement Speed.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reports that collect and organize dietary reference intake (DRI) data for military operations in different countries and regions worldwide are limited.This scoping review aimed to collect and organize information on the status of formulating a DRI for military operations in each country. Methodology: For the information search, we queried PubMed and Google for literature and reports on the DRI for military operations and summarized the content of the adopted literature and reports. Results: The content and rationale for DRI for military operations in Australia, the United Kingdom (UK), the United States of America (USA), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) can be summarized as follows: (1) Energy requirements: Four reports formulated physical activity levels (PALs) and corresponding energy requirements that differed from those for the civilian public. The PAL range for the military was set as high as 1.50-3.20, as opposed to the standard civilian upper PAL set at 1.20-2.20. (2) Protein: Three military reports outside of the UK had different standards than those for the civilian public with an increased intake in accordance with the high PAL while simultaneously preventing excessive intake.In the military, values were formulated 1.2-4.8 times higher than the standards for civilians (45-65 g/day to 55-307 g/day). (3) Macronutrient energy distribution: Four military reports established macronutrient energy distributions that differed from those for the civilian public. The DRI for the Australian and UK militaries was formulated such that as PAL increased, protein decreased, fat decreased or remained unchanged, and carbohydrate increased. (4) Sodium: Considering that military personnel sweat more due to high physical activity and their environment, two Australian and NATO reports were established with sodium levels that were twice as high as that of the civilian public (460-2,300 mg/day to 920-3,200 mg/day). Increasing sodium intake to <4,800 mg/day is recommended for individuals who sweat a lot or are not accustomed to hot environments. Conclusions: The DRI in Australia, the UK, USA, and NATO consider the physical activity and operating environment of military personnel, differing from those of the civilian population in terms of (1) energy requirements, (2) protein, (3) macronutrient energy distribution, and (4) sodium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.