Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512308›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Dietary reference intake for military operations: a scoping review.

Ryoko Mizushima, Motohiko Miyachi, Eiichi Yoshimura, Yoichi Hatamoto, Mai Matsumoto, Yuka Hamada, Mana Hatanaka, Aya Maeno, Chifumi Shimomura, Hidemi Takimoto

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryoko MizushimaFaculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Motohiko MiyachiFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Eiichi YoshimuraDepartment of Nutrition and Metabolism, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.
Yoichi HatamotoDepartment of Nutrition and Metabolism, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.
Mai MatsumotoDepartment of Nutritional Epidemiology and Shokuiku, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health, and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.
Yuka HamadaDepartment of Nutrition and Metabolism, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.
Mana HatanakaDepartment of Nutrition and Metabolism, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.
Aya MaenoDepartment of Nutrition and Metabolism, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.
Chifumi ShimomuraDepartment of Nutritional Epidemiology and Shokuiku, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health, and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.
Hidemi TakimotoDepartment of Nutritional Epidemiology and Shokuiku, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health, and Nutrition, Settsu, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reports that collect and organize dietary reference intake (DRI) data for military operations in different countries and regions worldwide are limited.This scoping review aimed to collect and organize information on the status of formulating a DRI for military operations in each country. Methodology: For the information search, we queried PubMed and Google for literature and reports on the DRI for military operations and summarized the content of the adopted literature and reports. Results: The content and rationale for DRI for military operations in Australia, the United Kingdom (UK), the United States of America (USA), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) can be summarized as follows: (1) Energy requirements: Four reports formulated physical activity levels (PALs) and corresponding energy requirements that differed from those for the civilian public. The PAL range for the military was set as high as 1.50-3.20, as opposed to the standard civilian upper PAL set at 1.20-2.20. (2) Protein: Three military reports outside of the UK had different standards than those for the civilian public with an increased intake in accordance with the high PAL while simultaneously preventing excessive intake.In the military, values were formulated 1.2-4.8 times higher than the standards for civilians (45-65 g/day to 55-307 g/day). (3) Macronutrient energy distribution: Four military reports established macronutrient energy distributions that differed from those for the civilian public. The DRI for the Australian and UK militaries was formulated such that as PAL increased, protein decreased, fat decreased or remained unchanged, and carbohydrate increased. (4) Sodium: Considering that military personnel sweat more due to high physical activity and their environment, two Australian and NATO reports were established with sodium levels that were twice as high as that of the civilian public (460-2,300 mg/day to 920-3,200 mg/day). Increasing sodium intake to <4,800 mg/day is recommended for individuals who sweat a lot or are not accustomed to hot environments. Conclusions: The DRI in Australia, the UK, USA, and NATO consider the physical activity and operating environment of military personnel, differing from those of the civilian population in terms of (1) energy requirements, (2) protein, (3) macronutrient energy distribution, and (4) sodium.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeMilitary PersonnelAustraliaDietary ProteinsExerciseHumansNutritional RequirementsRecommended Dietary AllowancesUnited KingdomUnited StatesDietary ProteinsDietEnergyMilitaryNutritionPhysical activityProteinReviewSodiumSoldierTraining

Identifiers

PMID39512308
PMCPMC11542563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.