Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512291›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical dentistry

Erosive Influence of Amazonian Tucupi on Microshear Bond Strength to Enamel and Dentin.

Reginna Vyctória Da Trindade Souza De Melo Carneiro, Mara Eliane Soares Ribeiro, Marina Lima Wanderley, Naama Waléria Alves Sousa, Paula Mendes Acatauassú Carneiro, Renan Campos Chisté, Sandro Cordeiro Loretto

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reginna Vyctória Da Trindade Souza De Melo CarneiroDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Center of the State of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Mara Eliane Soares RibeiroDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Marina Lima WanderleyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Center of the State of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Naama Waléria Alves SousaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Center of the State of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Paula Mendes Acatauassú CarneiroDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Center of the State of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Renan Campos ChistéFaculty of Food Engineering, Institute of Technology, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Sandro Cordeiro LorettoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Center of the State of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The scientific literature has studies that assess the influence of erosive challenges with citric acidic drinks and substances on the adhesive bond strength to enamel and dentin, but does not contain information about the influence of regional components of an acidic diet on this process. Thus, this study evaluated the erosive influence of Amazonian tucupi on enamel and dentin microshear bond strength. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixty-eight healthy bovine incisors teeth were used, divided into 12 groups ( Results: There were no significant differences in enamel ( Conclusion: The erosive challenge with tucupi did not influence the bond strength to enamel and dentin, regardless of the adhesive strategy used.

Indexed as

DentinenamelManihot esculentashear strengthtooth erosion

Identifiers

PMID39512291
PMCPMC11540205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.