ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024
Feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bulky early stage to stage IIIB cervical cancer in Uganda.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) became unavailable in Uganda from February 2016 to November 2017. Following resource stratification guidelines, an alternative treatment strategy was developed. Methods: Bulky early stage to Stage IIIB patients received at least 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Surgery was performed if adequate response was achieved and adjuvant therapy given for high risk factors. Chemotherapy versus supportive care was advised in unresectable disease. NAC protocol completion was defined as receiving at least 3 cycles of NAC followed by either surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation, or best supportive care. The purpose of this study was to determine the completion rate of NAC and assess the adverse events associated with treatment. Data were collected through retrospective chart review. Results: From February 2016 to November 2018, 53 evaluable patients were identified. 86.8% (46/53) of patients presented in Stage IIB or higher. The completion rate of the NAC protocol was 75.5% (40/53). 94.3% (50/53) received platinum-taxane combination. 7.6% (4/52) grade 3 adverse events occurred related to chemotherapy, all hematologic. 18.8% (10/53) patients underwent surgery with 2 aborted cases due to metastatic or inoperable disease. No adverse events related to surgery were reported. 5 patients underwent adjuvant therapy after surgery due to high risk factors or incomplete pathology findings. 26 patients received adjuvant radiation (3 brachytherapy, 23 EBRT after it became available). Reported side effects related to radiation included vaginal fibrosis and skin reactions. Conclusion: In this limited-resource setting, majority of patients completed a NAC treatment strategy for cervical cancer with acceptable toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.