Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512253›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Cryotherapy and Electrosurgery in the Treatment of Sebaceous Hyperplasia, Seborrheic Keratosis, Cherry Angioma, and Skin Tag: A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, Mojtaba Shafiei, Najmolsadat Atefi, Abbas Dehghani, Arezoo Pashaei, Mehraneh Karimzadeh, Azadeh Goodarzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-BazarganDepartment of Dermatology Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mojtaba ShafieiDepartment of Dermatology Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Najmolsadat AtefiDepartment of Dermatology Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Abbas DehghaniDepartment of Dermatology Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9277-3606
Arezoo PashaeiDepartment of Dermatology Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mehraneh KarimzadehDepartment of Dermatology Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Azadeh GoodarziDepartment of Dermatology Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-4429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cryotherapy and electrosurgery are two commonly used methods to remove sebaceous hyperplasia, seborrheic keratosis, cherry angioma, and skin tags, which can be bothersome and uncomfortable. We compare the effectiveness and adverse effects of cryotherapy and electrosurgery in treating these skin conditions. Method: The study was conducted as an assessor-blind trial. The 32 lesions in each lesion group were divided into two treatment groups, cryotherapy and electrosurgery, using sealed envelopes. We collected baseline information, which included age, gender, lesion location, and consent, from the patients. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after the initial treatment session to evaluate the response rate of the lesions. Based on before-after clinical images, this evaluation encompassed patient and physician satisfaction (no change, little, somewhat, good, and excellent), and any potential complications. Results: The mean age of cryotherapy group was 52.04 ± 11.59 years, while the mean age in the electrosurgery group was 50.48 ± 10.70 years ( Conclusion: It appears that electrosurgery is more effective in the treatment of sebaceous hyperplasia, cherry angioma and skin tags, while cryotherapy is more effective in the treatment of seborrheic keratosis.

Indexed as

cherry angiomacryotherapyelectrosurgerysebaceous hyperplasiaseborrheic keratosisskin tag

Identifiers

PMID39512253
PMCPMC11541056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.