ArticleHealth science reports2024
The Effect of Scenario-Based Group Discussion Training on the Nursing Students' Creativity: A Randomized Educational Controlled Trial.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Influence of standardized patient combined with narrative nursing teaching on experimental teaching of surgical nursing: A quasi-experimental study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- SPOC (Small Private Online Course)-infused flipped classroom: a promising approach to address knowledge lag and practice gaps in infectious diseases teaching.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Applying the clinical scenario teaching method using approaches such as group discussion facilitates the possibility of learning and developing creativity in a real clinical learning environment. However, few studies have been done in this field. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of scenario-based group discussion training on the creativity level of nursing students. Material and Methods: This study was a randomized controlled educational trial from January to October 2019 conducted on nursing students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Nursing students were randomly assigned into intervention and control groups (22 per each group). The students in the intervention group participated in a training program consisting of three 60-min sessions per week for two consecutive weeks. In each session, 2-3 scenarios were presented, and the students discussed about it. Each student was asked to submit a practical activity in a written story. In the control group, the training was conducted in the usual way (Students' presentation and discussion of presented content without scenario presentation). Data were collected using a validated creativity questionnaire. Data were analyzed in SPSS software, version 22, using Chi-square and Results: The results showed that immediately after the intervention, a difference was observed between the groups concerning the mean score of fluency ( Conclusion: It can be concluded that scenario-based group discussion training is effective for improving the dimensions of the fluency and originality creativity of nursing students. It seems that scenario-based education is an appropriate radical method for traditional education methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.