ArticleStatistics in biosciences2023
Semiparametric Trend Analysis for Stratified Recurrent Gap Times Under Weak Comparability Constraint.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrent event data are frequently encountered in many longitudinal studies where each individual may experience more than one event. Wang and Chen (Biometrics 56(3):789-794, 2000) proposed a comparability constraint to estimate the time trend for the gap times, where the gap time pairs that satisfy the constraint have the same conditional distribution. However, the comparable paired gap times are also independent. Therefore, the comparable gap time pairs will be subject to a stronger constraint than needed for the estimation. Thus their procedure is subject to information loss. Under the accelerated failure time model, we propose a new comparability constraint that can overcome the drawback mentioned above. The gap time pairs being selected by the proposed comparability constraint will still have the same distribution, but they do not need to be independent of each other. We showed that the proposed comparability constraint will utilize more gap time data pairs than the strong comparability. And we showed via various simulation studies that the variance will be smaller than Wang and Chen's (2000) estimator. We apply the proposed method to the HIV Prevention Trial Network 052 study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.