ArticleMuscle & nerve2025
The strength of associations between ultrasound measures of upper limb muscle morphology and isometric muscle strength: An exploratory study.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between Onodera's prognostic nutritional Index and ultrasound-measured muscle thickness in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- The strength of associations between ultrasound measures of upper limb muscle morphology and isometric muscle strength: An exploratory study.Muscle & nerve · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsAssessing upper limb muscle strength is important for understanding health outcomes, such as daily function and mortality. Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used to evaluate muscle health, but the relationship between its measures of morphology and isometric strength has not been thoroughly explored in upper limb muscles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations between US morphological measures and isometric strength in functionally relevant upper limb muscles in healthy adults.
methodsTwenty-four healthy volunteers (30.0 ± 10.8 years) underwent B-mode, axial US scans of the first dorsal interosseus (FDI), flexor pollicis longus (FPL), biceps brachii (BB), brachialis (BR), and triceps brachii lateral head (TB). Participants performed corresponding maximal voluntary contractions (MVC), including first digit distal phalanx flexion, second digit abduction, and elbow flexion and extension. US images were segmented to obtain maximal muscle thickness (MT) and cross-sectional area (CSA).
resultsStrong positive correlations were found between muscle strength and BB MT (r = .83; p < .001), BR CSA (r = .84; p < .001), and TB MT (r = .70; p < .001). Moderate positive correlations were found for strength and FDI CSA (r = .67; p < .001), FDI MT (r = .47; p < .05), FPL CSA (r = .54; p < .01), and FPL MT (r = .42; p < .05). No significant correlation was found between strength and BR MT (r = .16; p > .05). DISCUSSION: Our data showed moderate-to-strong associations between US muscle morphology and strength, suggesting that US is likely a good biomarker for strength. However, its use is not "one size fits all." Future investigations should continue to assess this relationship in different muscles and expand the generalizability to clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.