ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024
Assessing polyomic risk to predict Alzheimer's disease using a machine learning model.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Dynamics of the Blood Proteome Within the Alzheimer Spectrum in Down Syndrome.Neurology · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Modeling for Alzheimer's Disease Risk Prediction and Validation.Revista de neurologia · 2026Article
- Blood biomarkers and artificial intelligence: toward precision medicine in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- A Scoping Review of Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Using Blood Biomarkers.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Review
- Exposome influences: a multi-omics perspective on the combined toxic effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Assessing polyomic risk to predict Alzheimer's disease using a machine learning model.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the elderly. Given that AD neuropathology begins decades before symptoms, there is a dire need for effective screening tools for early detection of AD to facilitate early intervention.
methodsHere, we used tree-based and deep learning methods to train polyomic prediction models for AD affection status and age at onset, employing genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and drug use data from UK Biobank. We used SHAP to determine the feature's importance.
resultsOur best-performing polyomic model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.87. We identified GFAP and CXCL17 proteins to be the strongest predictors of AD, besides apolipoprotein E (APOE) alleles. Increasing the number of cases by including "AD-by-proxy" cases did not improve AD prediction. DISCUSSION: Among the four modalities, genomics, and proteomics were the most informative modality based on AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). Our data suggest that two blood-based biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP] and CXCL17) may be effective for early presymptomatic prediction of AD. HIGHLIGHTS: We developed a polyomic model to predict AD and age-at-onset using omics and medication use data from EHR. We identified GFAP and CXCL17 proteins to be the strongest predictors of AD, besides APOE alleles. "AD-by-proxy" cases, if used in training, do not improve AD prediction. Proteomics was the most informative modality overall for affection status and AAO prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.