Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Plaque Removal and Gingival Bleeding Using Biodegradable Toothbrushes: Salvadora persica, Bamboo, and Nylon: A Comparative Study.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biodegradable vs. conventional toothbrushes for biofilm control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little information available comparing eco-friendly products versus traditional plastic-based oral care implements. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the plaque removal efficacy and bacterial contamination of biodegradable miswak (S. persica) toothbrushes with bamboo toothbrushes and conventional toothbrushes. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single-blinded, parallel randomized, observational comparative study comprised 30 participants aged 18-35 years. Participants were randomized into 3 groups of 10 participants each: miswak (S. persica) brush, bamboo brush, and regular toothbrush). Participants were trained on proper brushing technique. Plaque and bleeding scores were measured by Loe and Sillness and Ainamo and Bay indices, respectively, at baseline (T0), at 4 weeks (T1), and 8 weeks (T2). Microbial contamination on the bristles of all 3 brushes was also evaluated. Multigroup comparison was done using one-way ANOVA, whereas inter-group comparisons were made using post hoc Bonferroni correction. RESULTS All 3 groups had lower plaque scores at the end of 8 weeks. A statistically significant reduction in the bleeding index in the miswak group was seen from baseline to week 8, with a 16.68% reduction in bleeding sites. Similar reductions were seen in the bamboo brush (21.04%) and conventional brush (22.7%) groups. Regular toothbrushes had almost 4 times more microbial contamination than bamboo brushes and more than double the level of miswak toothbrushes. Significant difference with ANOVA test was seen among the 3 tooth brushes, with P value 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Miswak natural toothbrushes and bamboo toothbrushes can be as effective as a conventional plastic toothbrush.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.