Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511862›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Plaque Removal and Gingival Bleeding Using Biodegradable Toothbrushes: Salvadora persica, Bamboo, and Nylon: A Comparative Study.

Hytham N Fageeh, Manawar A Mansoor, Hammam I Fageeh, Hina N Abdul, Lujain Kh Mawkili, Shreefah M Faris, Bashayr M Zubayni, Zainab A Alfardan, Meshal Saleh Zaidan, Shankargouda Patil and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hytham N FageehDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Manawar A MansoorDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Hammam I FageehDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Hina N AbdulDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Lujain Kh MawkiliIntern, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Shreefah M FarisIntern, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-3095
Bashayr M ZubayniIntern, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab A AlfardanIntern, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Meshal Saleh ZaidanIntern, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Shankargouda PatilCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT, USA.
Ashok Kumar BhatiDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4757-5843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is little information available comparing eco-friendly products versus traditional plastic-based oral care implements. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the plaque removal efficacy and bacterial contamination of biodegradable miswak (S. persica) toothbrushes with bamboo toothbrushes and conventional toothbrushes. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single-blinded, parallel randomized, observational comparative study comprised 30 participants aged 18-35 years. Participants were randomized into 3 groups of 10 participants each: miswak (S. persica) brush, bamboo brush, and regular toothbrush). Participants were trained on proper brushing technique. Plaque and bleeding scores were measured by Loe and Sillness and Ainamo and Bay indices, respectively, at baseline (T0), at 4 weeks (T1), and 8 weeks (T2). Microbial contamination on the bristles of all 3 brushes was also evaluated. Multigroup comparison was done using one-way ANOVA, whereas inter-group comparisons were made using post hoc Bonferroni correction. RESULTS All 3 groups had lower plaque scores at the end of 8 weeks. A statistically significant reduction in the bleeding index in the miswak group was seen from baseline to week 8, with a 16.68% reduction in bleeding sites. Similar reductions were seen in the bamboo brush (21.04%) and conventional brush (22.7%) groups. Regular toothbrushes had almost 4 times more microbial contamination than bamboo brushes and more than double the level of miswak toothbrushes. Significant difference with ANOVA test was seen among the 3 tooth brushes, with P value 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Miswak natural toothbrushes and bamboo toothbrushes can be as effective as a conventional plastic toothbrush.

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueToothbrushingAdolescentAdultBambusaFemaleGingival HemorrhageHumansMaleNylonsOral HygieneSalvadoraceaeSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultNylons

Identifiers

PMID39511862
PMCPMC11555888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.