Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511854›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024

Dual-Plate Fixation in Treatment of Clavicle Fractures in Dementia Patients: A Case Series.

Dae-Geun Kim, Eugene Jae Jin Park, Sung Choi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dae-Geun KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Gumi, South Korea.
Eugene Jae Jin ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Sung ChoiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Clavicle fractures are a common injury, and the standard surgical treatment for displaced shaft fractures is plate fixation using a single superiorly-placed plate. However, the use of this technique in dementia patients poses challenges, including increased risk of postoperative complications such as fixation failure, mal-union, and non-union. CASE REPORT This is a case series of 2 patients who had clavicle shaft fracture with dementia. The first was a 90-year-old woman with right clavicle fracture and vascular dementia. She underwent superior locking compression plate fixation, but the plate was pulled out because of her uncooperativeness. Therefore, we performed dual-plate fixation. She did not immobilize her arm after the surgery, but the plate did not pull out and she was doing well without any problems in daily life. The second patient was a 78-year-old man with advanced dementia who had a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture after a fall. Due to his inability to cooperate and follow postoperative instructions, a decision was made to employ a dual plating technique with plates applied anteriorly and superiorly. At 6-month follow-up, he had satisfactory functional outcomes and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. CONCLUSIONS The use of dual-plate fixation in the treatment of clavicle fractures in dementia patients is a viable option that can lead to successful outcomes and no failure-related implants.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesClavicleFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39511854
PMCPMC11556442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.