Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511821›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

The impact of early childhood education and care-based interventions on child physical activity, anthropometrics, fundamental movement skills, cognitive functioning, and social-emotional wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alice Grady, Rebecca Lorch, Luke Giles, Hannah Lamont, Amy Anderson, Nicole Pearson, Maria Romiti, Melanie Lum, Ashleigh Stuart, Lucy Leigh and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Evidence Mapping: Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Practice Elements in Early Childhood Education and Care.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alice GradySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-5340
Rebecca LorchSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Luke GilesHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia.
Hannah LamontHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia.
Amy AndersonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Nicole PearsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Maria RomitiHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia.
Melanie LumSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Ashleigh StuartData Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Lucy LeighData Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Sze Lin YoongNational Centre of Implementation Science (NCOIS), University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1170042National Heart Foundation of Australia Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship 106654National Heart Foundation of Australia Heart Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship 102518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review assessed the effectiveness of ECEC-based interventions to improve child physical activity, and intervention impact on child weight-based anthropometrics, fundamental movement skills (FMS), cognitive functioning, and social-emotional wellbeing. Adverse effects and costs were assessed. Finch et al's 2014 systematic review was updated. Electronic databases were searched 10 September 2014 to 27 October 2022. Included studies were randomized controlled trials of ECEC interventions targeting physical activity among children aged 0-6 years. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool v2. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for each outcome with meta-analysis undertaken; otherwise, findings were described narratively. Fifty-three studies were included. ECEC-based interventions were found to significantly improve child physical activity (SMD 0.193, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.3; p < 0.001) and FMS (SMD 0.544, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.98; p = 0.015), compared to control. Small positive, but non-significant, effects were found for weight-based anthropometrics, cognitive functioning, and social-emotional wellbeing. Few studies reported adverse effects (n = 10), and no studies reported formal economic analyses. While ECEC-based interventions can significantly improve child physical activity and FMS, further evidence of their impact on cognitive functioning, social-emotional wellbeing, and the cost-effectiveness of such interventions is required to inform policy and practice.

Indexed as

CognitionExerciseAnthropometryChildChild, PreschoolEarly Intervention, EducationalHumansInfantMotor SkillsPediatric Obesityearly childhood education and careinterventionphysical activitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39511821
PMCPMC11711080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.