ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2024
Soil P-stimulating bacterial communities: response and effect assessment of long-term fertilizer and rhizobium inoculant application.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritizing soil microbiome management and microbial restoration in low-income settings.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Perfluorotetradecanoic Acid (PFTeDA) and Biostimulants on Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity and the Growth ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Rhizobial Inoculation Improves Soil Properties and Microbial Network Stability to SupportMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Root-derived low molecular weight organic acids modulate keystone microbial taxa impacting plant phosphorus acquisition.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Impact of wheat straw incorporation and fertilizer reduction on peanut yield and soil functions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhosphorus (P) plays a vital role in plant growth. The pqqC and phoD genes serve as molecular markers for inorganic and organic P breakdown, respectively. However, the understanding of how P-mobilizing bacteria in soil respond to long-term fertilization and rhizobium application is limited. Herein, soil that had been treated with fertilizer and rhizobium for 10 years was collected to investigate the characteristics of P-mobilizing bacterial communities. Five treatments were included: no fertilization (CK), phosphorus fertilizer (P), urea + potassium fertilizer (NK), NPK, and PK + Bradyrhizobium japonicum 5821 (PK + R).
resultsThe soybean nodule dry weight was highest in the P treatment (1.93 g), while the soybean yield peaked in the PK + R treatment (3025.33 kg ha
conclusionsThese findings affirm the crucial role of fertilization and rhizobium inoculation in regulating pqqC- and phoD-harboring bacterial communities, and highlight the significance of long-term phosphate-only fertilization and rhizobium inoculation in enhancing dissolved inorganic phosphorus and mineralized organophosphorus, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.