Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511679›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024

Survival outcomes of lymph node dissection in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: identifying suitable candidates.

Huan Wang, Shuanghui Wang, Pengyu Wang, Yimin Han

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07508306 (Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Patent Blue Dye in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07508306 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Patent Blue Dye in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFaculty of Medicine of TunisRan2026 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), Early Stage Ovarian TumorsArmsSentinel node biopsy with patent blue dye
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huan WangDepartment of Gynaecology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 998 Aiying Street, Songbei District, 150023, Harbin, HeiLongjiang, P.R. China.
Shuanghui WangDepartment of Gynaecology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150, Haping Road, Harbin HeiLongjiang, 150081, Harbin, P.R. China.
Pengyu WangDepartment of Gynaecology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 998 Aiying Street, Songbei District, 150023, Harbin, HeiLongjiang, P.R. China.
Yimin HanDepartment of Gynaecology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 998 Aiying Street, Songbei District, 150023, Harbin, HeiLongjiang, P.R. China. hanyimin0808@163.com.

Funding

Beijing Medical Award Foundation YXJL-2021-0379-0321Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Medical Development Fund KC2021-JX-0186-FK-001Haiyan Foundation JJZD 2022-16the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province LH2022H064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to assess the effect of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in patients presenting with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer and to delineate patient characteristics that may indicate a greater benefit from pelvic lymph node dissection.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on individuals diagnosed with clinical stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer who received primary cytoreductive surgery at the Cancer Hospital Affiliated with Harbin Medical University from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2018. The investigation encompassed an examination of demographic data, clinicopathological profiles, perioperative complications, and survival outcomes.

resultsA total of 315 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer were incorporated into the study and were segregated into two distinct cohorts: 217 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (Group A) and 98 patients who did not undergo the procedure (Group B). The disparities in progression-free survival and overall survival between the two cohorts did not attain statistical significance (p > 0.05). Upon conducting a subgroup analysis, it was discerned that patients characterized by clear cell carcinoma as the pathological subtype demonstrated a significantly extended progression-free survival post-lymphadenectomy (p = 0.02). Additionally, the operative duration for the patients in Group A was significantly protracted in comparison to Group B (146.15 ± 39.132 min vs. 133.49 ± 35.308 min, P = 0.043).

conclusionFor patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, lymph node dissection does not significantly improve progression-free or overall survival rates. Our findings suggest that individuals with clear cell carcinoma pathology have a higher probability of benefiting in terms of survival following lymph node dissection.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsAdenocarcinoma, Clear CellAdultAgedCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymph NodesMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateEarly epithelial ovarian cancerGroup selectionLymph node dissectionSurvival prognosis

Identifiers

PMID39511679
PMCPMC11542237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.