ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
Survival outcomes of lymph node dissection in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: identifying suitable candidates.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07508306 (Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Patent Blue Dye in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Patent Blue Dye in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer by using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Cystadenofibroma and contralateral collision lesions: A unique ovarian case report.Oncoscience · 2025Article
- Development and validation of nomograms to forecast overall survival and cancer-specific survival in Asian patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe study aimed to assess the effect of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in patients presenting with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer and to delineate patient characteristics that may indicate a greater benefit from pelvic lymph node dissection.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on individuals diagnosed with clinical stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer who received primary cytoreductive surgery at the Cancer Hospital Affiliated with Harbin Medical University from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2018. The investigation encompassed an examination of demographic data, clinicopathological profiles, perioperative complications, and survival outcomes.
resultsA total of 315 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer were incorporated into the study and were segregated into two distinct cohorts: 217 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (Group A) and 98 patients who did not undergo the procedure (Group B). The disparities in progression-free survival and overall survival between the two cohorts did not attain statistical significance (p > 0.05). Upon conducting a subgroup analysis, it was discerned that patients characterized by clear cell carcinoma as the pathological subtype demonstrated a significantly extended progression-free survival post-lymphadenectomy (p = 0.02). Additionally, the operative duration for the patients in Group A was significantly protracted in comparison to Group B (146.15 ± 39.132 min vs. 133.49 ± 35.308 min, P = 0.043).
conclusionFor patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, lymph node dissection does not significantly improve progression-free or overall survival rates. Our findings suggest that individuals with clear cell carcinoma pathology have a higher probability of benefiting in terms of survival following lymph node dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.